Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-03-25 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-03-25 Senate Journal Page 2871 SB 250 CSSB 250(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, R.Phillips, Salo, Taylor, Zharoff and so, the amendment to Amendment No. 2 failed. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 250(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, R.Phillips, Salo, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Taylor moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 3. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Taylor offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 12, lines 3- 15: Delete all material. 1996-03-25 Senate Journal Page 2872 SB 250 Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 14, lines 27- 28: Delete "secs. 5, 11, 12, and 16" Insert "secs. 5, 10, 11, and 15" Senator Taylor moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Frank objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 250(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Taylor moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 4. Senator Frank objected. The question being: Shall the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-03-25 Senate Journal Page 2873 SB 250 CSSB 250(FIN) am Return to Second for Specific Amendment YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Lincoln, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Sharp and so, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Taylor offered Amendment No. 4 : Page 12, following line 30: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 13. AS14.40.400(c) is amended to read: (c) The net income from the trust fund shall be used exclusively for the University of Alaska which, under AS14.40.390, is designated the beneficiary of certain federal land grants previously made to the Agricultural College and School of Mines. However, not less than 25 percent of the income earned by the trust fund from land described in (a) of this section, and from the resources of that land, is reserved for expenditure solely for the benefit of the campus of the University of Alaska, as defined by AS14.40.150(b), that is nearest to the land or resource activity that generated the amounts deposited under (a) of this section on which that income was earned." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Senator Taylor moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Frank objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-03-25 Senate Journal Page 2874 SB 250 CSSB 250(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Taylor, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 4 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. The question being: Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am An Act relating to the University of Alaska and to assets of the University of Alaska; authorizing the University of Alaska to select additional state public domain land, designating that land as `university trust land,' and describing the principles applicable to the land's management and the development of its resources; and defining the net income from the University of Alaska's endowment trust fund as `university receipts' subject to prior legislative appropriation pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 250(FIN) am Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Taylor, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 250(FIN) am passed the Senate. 1996-03-25 Senate Journal Page 2875 SB 250 Senator Duncan gave notice of reconsideration.